DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Bugg, Julie M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Suh, Jihyun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Colvett, Jackson S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lehmann, Spencer G. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-24T00:50:34Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-24T00:50:34Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-11-23 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-09 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0096-1523 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://oasis.postech.ac.kr/handle/2014.oak/107607 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Crump and Milliken (2009) reported a context-specific proportion congruence (CSPC) effect for inducer and diagnostic sets, the strongest evidence to date of context-specific control. Attempts to replicate/reproduce this evidence have failed, including Experiment I. Using a picture-word Stroop task, we tackled the question of how to interpret such failures by testing the consistency hypothesis (Hutcheon & Spieler, 2017) and two novel hypotheses inspired by our theorizing about learning opportunities in the CSPC paradigm. Experiment 2 found a CSPC effect when there was no diagnostic set, supporting the consistency hypothesis. Experiment 3 produced novel evidence for item-PC learning in a CSPC paradigm. In contrast, Experiment 4 did not produce strong evidence for location-item conjunctive learning. Our findings suggest failures to replicate/reproduce the CSPC effect do not necessarily indicate a Type I error or instability but instead may indicate episodic representations were organized based on item and not location. This item-PC learning hypothesis uniquely predicted Experiment 3 findings and accommodates findings of all but one prior attempt to replicate/reproduce the CSPC effect for inducer and diagnostic sets, including Experiment 1. Predicting whether future attempts are successful will require deeper understanding of the factors that promote learning of item-PC versus location-PC associations. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.publisher | American Psychological Association | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance | - |
dc.title | What can be learned in a context-specific proportion congruence paradigm? Implications for reproducibility. | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1037/xhp0000801 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, v.46, no.9, pp.1029 - 1050 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000563803900012 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 1050 | - |
dc.citation.number | 9 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 1029 | - |
dc.citation.title | Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance | - |
dc.citation.volume | 46 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Suh, Jihyun | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85087299932 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ITEM-SPECIFIC CONTROL | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | COGNITIVE CONTROL | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | LOCATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | INTERFERENCE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ADAPTATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | AWARENESS | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | cognitive control | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | context-specific proportion congruence | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | learning | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | reproducibility | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Psychology | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Psychology, Experimental | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | ssci | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Psychology | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
library@postech.ac.kr Tel: 054-279-2548
Copyrights © by 2017 Pohang University of Science ad Technology All right reserved.